✓ Best code, checked: we list the biggest working code we’ve found for every firm, tested at checkout.Found a bigger one? Tell us →
✓Data verified 8 Oct 2026 · Last updated 8 Oct 2026 · Methodology
△ Futures

FundingTicks vs Phidias: Which Futures Eval Is Cheaper?

Phidias is cheaper in the first month at 50K: $126.75 vs $149.25 with our codes. Phidias gives more room per dollar of target (PT:DD 1:0.67). On Trustpilot, Phidias scores higher (4.4 from 1,340 reviews), which is Trustpilot’s data, not ours. FundingTicks uses eod trailing drawdown with a 90% split and no activation fee; Phidias uses static drawdown with a 100% split and no activation fee.

Futures firms only
Compare at◆ marks the better value for traders
FFundingTicksLightning · $50K Visit PPhidiasStatic · $50K Visit
Cost
Price with code $149.25one-time◆$126.75monthly
Original price $199.00$169.00
First month $149.25◆$126.75
Activation fee $0$0
Reset $119.00◆$79.00
Rules
Plan Lightning · InstantStatic · 1-step
Profit target —$1,500
Daily loss $1,200◆None
Max loss ◆$2,000$1,000
Drawdown EOD trailingStatic
PT:DD —◆1:0.67
Max contracts ◆4 | 403 | 30
Consistency 50% | 30%50% | 20%
Payouts
Profit split 90%◆100%
Frequency Daily, from the first funded day5 winning days of $200+
Min payout $250$250
Platforms
Platforms Tradovate, NinjaTrader, TradingViewNinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic
Reputation
TrustScore (Trustpilot) 4.3◆4.4
Trustpilot reviews 820◆1,340
Years operating 2 yr◆3 yr
Headquarters ——

Which one fits you?

Pick FundingTicks if you want an eod trailing drawdown and TradingView.

Pick Phidias if you want the lower first-month cost ($126.75), a higher split (100%), a static drawdown and Rithmic.